Even though there are many reasons why players might want to play tall, Stellaris indeed lacks functionalities that provide incentives for tall play (unless you count the negative incentive of planet & pop management). Building Tall Pacifist Empire. "Tall" in Stellaris isn't doing more with less, it's just having less. . If you play habitats you can get more resources from jobs without actually taking up more space. After playing a couple variations of necrophage, I started organizing my thoughts to try and learn what worked best for me and why. Playing tall infers having fewer and more productive planets instead of a ton of mediocre planets. HopeFox • 6 yr. Playing tall or playing wide, which is better!? Most players start by building and advancing their empires in stellaris with a typical : expand, then build out planets and other parts. HopeFox • 6 yr. self. "Tall" as compared to "wide" is generally presumed to be going really high development on a low number of cities/planets (depending on your game), rather than low development of a high number of cities. Best. "Tall" as compared to "wide" is generally presumed to be going really high development on a low number of cities/planets (depending on your game), rather than low development of a high number of cities. That's enough to fight 25x in 2300. Abdulijubjub Field Marshal. In that case, megacorp is always good, and void dweller will help overcome the main downside of tall: not enough planets. Its the eternal question that decides how you’re going to play your game of stellaris and what you early strategy is going to be. There are a lot of very easy to make changes that would make the choices a lot more equal if not perfect. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. Bribe them, then submit to vassalisation. As a long time Crusader Kings 2. Every time. Yup. habitats as well as branch offices contribute to empire size. Mar 4, 2022. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. With that being said, playing tall in Stellaris is a lot harder than you think! How, then, can you get started playing tall in this game? Keep reading to discover our comprehensive guide! Set Your Limits How to play tall? I thought the changes to unity, particularly the planetary ascension mechanic, would make it ideal for a corporate empire to play tall, so I gave it a shot. Playing tall is a long-term strategy, so players should generally start using it. If the devs want to make the game all about. Which in itself may or may not be desired. Stellaris is modelling a whole host of SciFi tropes while also being a 4X game (opposed to the previous two's grand strategy genre). Relic world start is pretty good if you can get a few planets to fuel. A 25k bastion requires 0 minerals per month. So in Stellaris this would probably be a habitat/megastructure heavy playstyle and trying to do things that give you extra districts on your planets. NB: this is system not planet. It is viable to for example use diplomacy and just build shit loads of habitats to grow populations and form alliances and federations and mostly invade to create new versions of your own empire and include them in your federations. (Not super-tall though, as in one planet, but only 8 planets and. If you make playing wide miserable thats bad too, because for many painting the map is. I don't understand how playing tall in this game works. 5. Here’s some early game development pointers: The most important resources in the game are Influence, Minerals, Unity, in that order. It can however be pretty challenging on to get right. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. Bribe them, then submit to vassalisation. For example the governors, and the space station. Stack research until you burst, playing tall without Megacorp or Inward Perfection is tricky, and the problem is that going wide will almost always work out better for you, even with DLC. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…The main problem is that Stellaris is a game of resources and pops are the most precious one, tall empires are awful in those regards and they also run the risk of lagging behind in the tech department which is bad. There is also the older mechanics such as increased tech cost per planet and ethics divergence by distance which will favour building tall. large number of poorly developed planets. It is way to easy to spam Burocrats to avoid any penalties from rapid expansion. It was never viable, and it's not even possible now with the new empire size changes. This is in part due to victory conditions which allow a "tall" strategy to work throughout the game, but also because you can leverage your "tall" advantages into a temporary tech advantage at the right times to break out as a large conqueror -- you don't need to. Wide empires have more pops. Tall vs Wide in Stellaris isn't a dichotomy, but rather a spectrum from one extreme to the other. 20 comments. Tall vs wide isn’t really something that makes sense in context of stellaris or real history. ago. Spreading all over the map is playing wide. Jun 14, 2021 2. Though to be honest, it doesn't really change my strategy in Stellaris all that much. Early on, the universe is filled. What are some key things to do in Stellaris to build tall effectively? I want to play tall because I have been a wide, rapid expansionist in playstyle in basically every 4x/grand strategy game I've played. NB: this is system not planet. Pacifism also allows the player to pick an exceptionally powerful Civic, Inward Perfection. Playing tall may make that a waste of a perk though. In Stellaris, some people play tall by only using a single planet, some go for a small number, like your starting 3, etc. There is still no better or more successful way to play the game than tech rush, expand like a virus and maxing out your fleet. In terms of strong tall builds that actually perform well, there are basically only two: Habitat Spam, and the Nihilistic Acquisition Raider. Related. having the biggest, most. 100% habitability is nice for migration treaties with other species that have desirable traits, and increases the chances of refugees in the lategame for more pop growth. Stellaris. The only playstyle I do not enjoy is playing with vassals, because I do not fully understand how to make that work and the little bits I do understand just make it seem rather bland. OPS is an excruciatingly tall play-style, but I do promise you'll pick up interchangeable skills that'll enhance your tall play. We will be (almost). With the changes made in 3. There needs to be incentives and/or boni for playing tall, like increased tech speed or unity gain. Wide was nerfed, but it's still "better" than Tall. 11 votes, 19 comments. This dichotomy really isn't applicable to Stellaris. 0 anglers got stronger. Making this a great strategy for beginners to try out. In fact it could be easier with more resources. Is there any viable way to play void devellers besides commerce-tech build P. Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. That's when the mandatory late game genocide comes in handy. I agree that this change makes habitat feeder worlds less desirable, I just don't think that's a nerf to what I'd consider "playing tall", or. All strategies assume you are trying to get maximum pops & maximum jobs on every planet. Playing tall was heavily nerfed with changes to habitats. That depends on what you mean by playing tall. You can do this by either vassalizing or stacking minus empire size modifiers. The problem is that it wasn't obvious because of. Cons: Lots of micro, allows for a degree of dabbling in tall play for otherwise wide empires. You could also invest in things like ringworlds for alternative planets. Make sure you are the only megacorp (by force if necessary) and make a trade federation or hegemony (depends on what you want to accomplish) become custodian (not emperor. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. But the tall/wide distinction isn’t all that meaningful in Stellaris — you’re still managing more worlds and taking up more empire size, just in a smaller geographical space. Well it depends. #56. . Stellaris has an abstraction for Tall vs Wide in-game: the Empire Size mechanic. Victoria 2 was released 12 years ago, and victoria 3 is set to be released this year. Megacorps are a solid empire-type. If you want to play a game where Tall playstyle is possible, play Endless Legend. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but people who play tall are "wrong". Use the outpost cost ethic and build plenty of outposts. Are you using the -dx11 option and borderless window, because trust me Stellaris is NOT single threaded, there was a dev blog post specifically discussing this in the past. If you want to play a Machine Empire with a special starting world, you could pick the origin that starts you on a Machine world. There hasn't been since like 1. I won by playing a Megacorp. r/Stellaris. I believe the large consensus among Stellaris players who pay attention to meta is that, in 2. I feel that nihilistic aquisition is the KEY to playing tall. The benefit from playing Tall should be that you make amends, and strong alliances with nearby neighbors, you're not a threat, and they like that. The tall playstyle dines like a gourmet only picking the very best and shunning the crud. also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. Stellaris "Tall" mainly means getting as much resources as possible out of a small(er) space. Generally, if you can have a large number of planets, there is little reason not to do so, since they will all develop more or less at the same pace. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather then 50 planets. The challenge can come in the form of story play elements or taking an origin that is plain bad. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. A "tall" empire's colonies aren't going to be much stronger or more populated than a wide empire's colonies. . 6. We have "wide with many systems" and "wide with few systems, but those systems contain thirty billion habitats". . A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. Tall is not efficient, it only gets you what you need and often pertains slaving. Compare Stellaris. it's important to understant that this advantage is a temporary thing. The winning strategy was always to expand as widely as possible because doing that. You want to find all the enclaves asap, kill monsters for more tech, and just generally get that tech up. It does require playing the game a lot differently than previously though. And it can help a lot of your species has traits like intelligent or strong to take advantage of the bonuses, every plus 5% can help your empire survive longer. Its more a general approach to stay small and go for quality or quantity. for civics, mechanist is pretty good, syncretic evolution is great too, technocracy is ideal. Highly stable, unified group thats close proximity keeps together. 2. 0 changed that, claiming systems increases tech cost as well as planets, but now population doesn't increase tech cost. 3 comments. I would however definitely recommend getting Utopia as soon as you can though, the sheer volume of content across all game phases. I prefer to use my custom made tall chair and pc table to play tall. It does not really do much for Tall vs Wide development patterns. Whether it be just one county or a small duchy, the player uses all of their resources to funnel a small area on the map. Playing tall is not only possible, it's insanely powerful and (on Insane), I am always the most powerful empire in the galaxy by 2400. Galactic footprint is a common usage for "wide vs tall" so you're not wrong, but op is correct in terms of game mechanics. This was: The Network. Stellaris is probably the best paradox game to play tall because stellaris. I don't know what version you're playing, but population growth is glacial in 3. Despite all the negative feedback from players who got used to 3. If you play tall right, you can get more than 15000 tech per month mid game. I've taken the society tech for a 10% naval capacity increase once or twice. In Stellaris you can't colonize a planet or build a habitat without claiming a system. 3 was plenty to tackle every unmodded challenge available. Your ability to make long term decisions is tied to Influence. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. but what tall is or isn't is another debate I suppose and I didn't feel confident in getting any points across without using the terminology. . 1. A Tall play now isnt about just being small, it is about being efficient. Part 1 is intended for beginners and explains the basics of roleplaying as well as how to integrate it into your games. 3 base systems + 2 from finishing Expansion traditions + 2 from Efficient Bureaucracy civic + 5 from Imperial Prerogative ascension perk (and maybe another 2/4 if you can stomach playing pacifist plus whatever core sector technologies you can research) is more than enough to get you orbital habitats. 4) playing tall was always a losing strategy and only something you do for roleplay or challenge reasons. In 5 hours I will play Stellaris with my friends. 0 ruleset that was revised in 3. Report. You could try to beat the Fallen. Even so, you still do want to expand towards your target, just for the influence. Empire Size currently provides a rubber band on big empires being better than small empires. I am enjoying playing "Tall" and focusing on tech, planets etc. Playing tall will give you a hefty chunk of feeling like a plotter, a devious schemer who carefully plans his eventual ascension to near godhood. Admin cap is super important since you're more sensitive to sprawl penalty. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of. Weekly PSA: Habitat spam is the definition of playing wide. Playstyles are how a player plans to tackle playing or even winning the game. So an interesting build: Play tall (ten systems and 2-3 planets). Even if we never get a way to truly play tall, we still need to fix the current pop growth model (dominated by how many worlds contribute their base 3. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris • by Nimitz-View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. That being said, if your definition of tall is "just 10 or 20 systems", you could go for a ringworld rush and just fill those 20 systems with them. Report. The pop growth bonus in particular is also augmented by the bonuses of xenophobe, for a possible 30% base pop growth. Build a world cracker or pacifier, declare war, and proceed to destroy all their habitable planets to wipe out the other empires and win a conquest victory. ) Playing Tall is a very special type of empire. You got two species that started (a robot and cyborgs), and you needed land on the hostile worlds (aka primitives or enemy empires worlds) with ground armies, Assimilate the pops then you basically have a new world under your name. Bureaucrats killed tall. Playing Tall is a very special type of empire. With wide you need a ton of governors, and must be replace them constantly. Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. Edit: I also think that playing pacifists is definitely the go-to way to try playing a tall empire, since you're kinda forced into it, as you can't conquer other empires territory. Acquire nihilistic acquisition (requires apocalypse dlc) and then try to fight long wars where you capture as many pops as possible. It would mimick a wide play power curve, but with a tall looking empire. 6 put the nails in the coffin, but Tall had one patch where it was "good" and that was quickly fixed. This guide is incredible. ago The_Godfather69 The Definitive Guide For "How To Play Tall" In Stellaris Console Edition Video This video is my Guide for: How to Play Tall in Stellaris Console. Ethics, Civics, Traditions and other choices strongly support or hinder certain Playstyles. But to really take advantage of that small empire size, you need to focus on research and unity. Before 2. It made the rest of the game very easy, getting a quarter population boost and the large Gaia world, as well as a massive territory free for the taking. Branch offices provide you a large income supplement, particularly credits, allowing you to focus your own economy. While I do know some general aspects of playing tall and I also know that in 2. One last tip about resettling pops to take ruler jobs: with slaver guilds, you may have to resettle 3 pops total to fill 2 ruler jobs on a newly conquered planet. This mod creates a new trait that will allows both Human and AI to play “play tall”. This may promote a "tall" growth of your empire, certainly helped by the presence of the Ecumenopolis, however this is a strategy that still has to find its place in the Stellaris meta. Very high output per system for when your packed in. Wide. Good picks: Rapid/Slow Breeders and Nomadic/Sedentary: Getting more pops quicker. It is great for high difficulties because you don’t have to attack the really powerful empires and can get them to pathetic by mid to late game. and the edicts and all the other bonuses from low empire size aren't enough as a semi wide empire would be. I believe this is OPS's most valuable asset. Yes, even when playing wide you still try to play as tall as possible but you first focus on expansion. Empire size has changed a lot over the years in Stellaris. Think about it like this: A 25k fleet will cost around 15-20k minerals, and a 25k starbase will cost about the same, but a 25k fleet takes roughly 300 minerals per month in upkeep. You misunderstood what "tall" means in Stellaris. 8 that I finally was able to bring into the current patch with the new planet mechanics. There's 2 ways to play Stellaris. Mind you, even when playing tall, I don't build them, I'd rather. The whole purpose of playing tall used to be to avoid going over admin cap which kept your research, campaigns, and leaders cheaper. 0 has brought massive changes to how buildings are acquired, how pops grow and how districts work. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. Could you. Nerfing wide to be as bad as tall just makes the game un-fun for everyone. Unyielding lets you support more Starbases, which means more room for Hydroponics buildings, which means more food without needing to devote pops to producing it. By mid- and certainly in the late game you should have a resource extraction planets feeding production and research planets. ago. That require you to explore and have them in your territory. On top of that bio trophies will count towards your pop cap, so if you don't play super tall your essentially short 100 robo pops compared to another machine empire. Tall play has been seriously buffed in this patch. Sero Mar 25 @ 2:18am. However its not completely ridiculous as a way to differentiate play styles. 2, I must say that I enjoy 3. Playing as an isolationist government with no access to unrestricted war, treaties, or other key social mechanics is a very different way of playing Stellaris, but it can be as fun as it is effective. 10x was very doable. As quill is trying to get 200 years of peace achievement. mining guilds is a lot better as the. For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from. If you want you can call this "its dead", but as long some people write a guide, there is a way to play tall. If you happen to trigger a certain precursor, but then the areas where their events can spawn end up occupied by other empires, you can be left with 0/6 hints. HappySack Mar 25 @ 3:07am. 0, we had several tall builds. Enslaving conquered populations is tricky and requires a lot of pop shuffling. We have another 2. Midgame though if you want to play tall, definitely transition into habitats in the systems you wish to develop. You get 20% from level 3 holy covenant, 25% from finishing the Harmony tradition tree (required to form holy covenant) and 25% from the civic. What's your strategie to play Tall. It ends up being. Your main species is fine for gaia worlds and relic worlds, but anything else will require a different species. 0 has a severe unity bug) - when it comes to both unity and research, more planets is always better. 3 a LOT. 3 is a bad idea. At 200 population (which isn't big enough. While for the latter, most empires that were widely spread also had ‘tall’. This misconception revolves around playing Tall vs playing Wide. Building slots don’t expand from population anymore and city districts do not expand them; so, every habitat will be a few slots big until end game. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. I explored my immediate area, only went after systems that were "behind" chokepoints (from an outside perspective), and tried to get the basic strategic resources (motes. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. the best origins for making the game harder are: Doomsday. 0 making playing tall a viable strategy. Okokok this is a pretty cool story, but of a long one but still. In a perfect run you would just grow large nough to start the vassalisation chain and then even shrink yourself a bit if over 100. Expand at all costs! Wide in general, less-wide if you intend to do an early war of conquest. Ascendant clones get crazy huge specialist bonuses, so what you want to do is pack them into forge and factory worlds. It is relatively. 419K subscribers in the Stellaris community. 2; Reactions: Reply. My 2 cents: tall and wide is a bit nebulous. . That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. This is the truth. 0 playing "tall" was nebulous at best. So a big issue with the proposed addition of sprawl penalties to pops (in addition to systems, planets and districts) is that it is a huge nerf to the tall strategy, which is bad since wide is already the clearly dominant strategy (since the tech/tradition penalty directly benefits "tall" play vs "wide" play, but is widely regarded as being. Advice Wanted. If you play as a non gestalt empire you can invest your influence into arcology projects for city planets. The wide playstyle embraces sprawl inefficiency like a friend absorbing everything it can, heedless of the diminishing returns. If you're spamming habitats, you aren't playing tall. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. Tall tends to focus more on vassals and federations, Wide more on integrating directly into your own empire. Technocracy is amazing for more research gains. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. Flashbacks to Vic 2 sphere system. The extra difficulty in higher difficulties is getting to where you can get to late game. ago. That's what 2. Tall empires. After a while, re-change your pops so that those on habitats get great specialist traits and those on planets get good worker traits. Kind of wish there were multiple assembly slots. It is how the terms have worked for the majority of games since I was paying by the minute to access the internet. The truth is there is no “tall” build anymore. 3; 1; 1; Reactions:. But you're right. Depeding on how many other empires there are, and where you are located, this can be a way to stay "tall" and dont have the feeling of that you are "wasting" systems out there. The current raiding playstyle (whether from civic or ascension perk) is worthless. Stellaris. Thread starter Vampiresoap; Start date Apr 25, 2017; Jump to latest Follow Reply Menu We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Intro Stellaris Tall Guide Montu Plays 130K subscribers Subscribe Subscribed 3. WebShaman • 6 yr. Stellaris. "Tall" no longer exists in versions after that change. So does pop assembly, which comes from one-per-colony buildings. Playing tall in Stellaris has always been a mean and not an end. Hello, since the Galactic Comunity came out with Federations, I been trying to get towards the frists empires that have the most Diplomatic Weight, however, my playstle are mostly playing tall, with few sectors and planets on it, and with a 1000 Star and 25 empires, it seemed that wide empires tend to have more diplomatic weight because they. Being able to work a wider variety of jobs is far more important than the small bonuses the other types of slavery get. This mechanic of diminishing returns leads to two distinctly different play styles, wide and tall. Get a branch office going as early as possible, even if it yeilds +0. I'm RPing a Determined Exterminator empire that doesn't want to grow…Honestly, walls like this I can live with, it's when the AI is blatantly pulling things out of it's ass it should have no way of obtaining that I start rage-quitting. Since colony ships wasn't researched at the start, I. Get those techs and traditions which will make your pops more efficient. The upcoming 3. Wide and Tall isn’t a stellaris definition, it’s used in many strategy games. If there was a way for even more primatives and most empires playing tall and maybe a few colonies, with most of their fleets coming from federations, then that would be a more true star trek scenario. Totally viable. But I think there's another, even more key reason why Stellaris should enable tall play, ideally without diminishing other playstyles in the process: Stellaris has a goal to accommodate a variety of story experiences, and to let the player enact a variety of classic sci-fi tropes. Best. The system is the backbone of Stellaris. are vassals just a prerequisite of playing tall. This gets into the debate about what people mean by "tall". Yeah, it would be nice if the game supported playing tall. Your empire’s planet is going to explode. 48. -By the proposed time of 2350, you will still be ahead of the AI's. 2;. I usually play "tall" by keeping my empire rather small, and instead subjugating as. You need about 100 complex drones on a single planet (IE ring worlds or Ecumenopoli) for each bio trophy to be equal to a single robot and that is the RS's biggest issue. In Stellaris, you don't make that choice. The problems with Stellaris, tall empires, 3. Overlord has changed a bunch of things when it comes to vassals and such. Since tall isn't a particularly viable long-term strategy, however, skipping those structures and investing the resources into widening your empire is likely more optimal. I really hope this video helps out everyone and thank you for watching! Nice to see some general coverage on the Tall Playstyle which arent specific Builds. Step 3. . After playing tall it feels really limiting to go back to wide which sucks because I get way more satisfaction from conquering large swathes of space than I do from basically playing as a fallen empire. ago. Too many planets to manage. With the changes made in 3. ago. You can no longer colonize large swaths of space with a vassal swarm either. -1. The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. How to play tall in stellaris: Switch your game version in the steam launcher to something from 30 years ago before admin cap jobs were added. Technology_Training • 3 mo. Those would be some of the most basic types of non-linear mechanic which could make Tall play start to exist. It's not about having few planets - in fact you should still get as many ( properly developed!!Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. Jul 10, 2023. For how to: watch some of montuplays newest guides regarding playing tall. The former is obvious as the pops system makes it all but impossible. Third is that people will want a Bulwark, but probabably as a 1-planet minor vassal, in order to get significant starbase discounts (20%) that will also apply to planetary rings. z0rbakpants • 2 yr. It's a playstyle meant for defense and not offense. Go away from modifying Empire Size to balance them. Top 1% Rank by size. I can't give you much perspective specific to your year as I can't be bothered to micromanage like that. It was not fun. Outside of this there is no "Tall" concept in Stellaris as more. 2. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. These changes will force players to decide whether to focus on fully developing what little. Playing tall is using the minimal amount of worlds, rather then the minimal amount of systems. The best way to play is to have as close to zero empire size whilst having the biggest science income. Empire size has changed a lot over the years in Stellaris. Currently, pretty much the whole galaxy is my vassals and also members of my hegemony, except for one who has been my ally since the very beginning. The 3. 7) ASpec 195K subscribers Join Subscribe 6.